Overview

COVID-19 RESPONSE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ESSENTIAL HEALTH SERVICES IN GHANA

Ghana’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was quick and comprehensive. Starting in March 2020, officials implemented a variety of measures, specifically in surveillance, contact tracing, and risk communication, designed to stop the spread of the novel coronavirus and mitigate its social and economic impacts. This early action, in addition to service delivery adaptation, also helped maintain the provision of essential health services from March 2020 through December 2021, despite strains on the country’s health system as a result of the pandemic.
Authors
Duah Dwomoh Isaac Yeboah Rawlance Ndejjo Steven Ndugwa Kabwama Issah Ibrahim Justice Moses Aheto Rhoda K. Wanyenze Julius Fobil

Cumulative COVID-19 deaths per million people

Compared with other selected countries
Our World in Data

Contents

Street mural encouraging people to mask up as part of the fight against COVID-19 in Accra, Ghana, on June 8, 2022.
Street mural encouraging people to mask up as part of the fight against COVID-19 in Accra, Ghana, on June 8, 2022.
Credit: Nana Kofi Acquah. Copyright: © Gates Ventures, LLC.

KEY INSIGHTS

Ghana implemented COVID-19 mitigation strategies in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic that were cross-cutting and comprehensive. They included case identification via contact tracing, public health and social measures such as movement restrictions, boosting the capacity of the health system to provide care for the sick and maintain the delivery of key essential health services, and policy interventions aimed at minimizing the pandemic’s effect on the country’s social and economic life.

This research was led by partners at the University of Ghana School of Public Health in collaboration with Makerere University School of Public Health and was supported and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and by the Exemplars in Global Health program at Gates Ventures.

Drivers of successful pandemic response

The World Health Organization and Global Health Security Agenda have developed useful frameworks for assessing epidemic and pandemic preparedness and response, which we have adapted for this research. Through our research, we aim to derive lessons learned about the drivers of a successful response and have developed a conceptual framework that categorizes the drivers into two groups: context and system factors and interventions, and also includes outcomes. The following pages on Ghana’s response to COVID-19 and the maintenance of essential health services are organized according to this framework.

Exemplars in COVID-19 conceptual framework for assessing epidemic preparedness and response

KEY INSIGHT

National, governmental, and population-level measures: surveillance

Limiting cases and deaths via centralized decision-making

Health officials in Ghana acted quickly to stop the spread of COVID-19 using tools and systems they already had. For example, the country’s preexisting District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) made it possible to share crucial data quickly with officials, health workers, and the public. The Surveillance Outbreak and Response Management and Analysis System (SORMAS), developed in Nigeria and adapted for the Ghanaian context, enabled officials to track COVID-19 cases in real time and adjust mitigation strategies accordingly.

The data helped inform authorities’ decisions to implement public health and social measures such as border and school closures and temporary lockdowns. It also enabled easier distribution of key resources including personal protective equipment, hand sanitizer, and face masks.

Placeholder
Murals campaigning against the stigmatization of COVID-19 in Accra, Ghana, on May 30, 2022. Credit: Nana Kofi Acquah.
Copyright: © Gates Ventures, LLC.
KEY INSIGHT

National, governmental, and population-level measures: testing for diagnosis and detection

Implementing the “3T” strategy: test, trace, and treat

Placeholder
Community health workers Wisdom Kpokpo and Precious Attah walk through a community in Kasoa, Ghana, on June 27, 2022.
Credit: Nana Kofi Acquah. Copyright: © Gates Ventures, LLC.

After Ghana recorded its first case of COVID-19 on March 12, 2020, officials implemented a system for targeted contact tracing to find infected people and stop the community spread of the novel coronavirus. Officials referred to this approach as the “3T” strategy—test, trace, and treat—since health workers referred everyone who tested positive for COVID-19 to a health facility for isolation and treatment.

As case counts increased, straining testing and laboratory capacity, the Ghana Health Service introduced pooled testing.1 This strategy enabled health authorities to test large numbers of samples in a short time even when laboratory capacity and key supplies such as equipment and reagents were limited.

KEY INSIGHT

National, governmental, and population-level measures: risk communication

Communicating with the public via mass and social media

The Ghanaian health system’s experience with previous outbreaks of infectious disease, such as Ebola virus disease and cholera, meant that it already had key tools for public health risk communication that could be adapted for COVID-19.

In March 2020, the Ghana Health Service, National Commission for Civic Education, and Ministry of Information aligned to provide high-quality, coordinated messaging on the COVID-19 pandemic including case counts, preventive measures, policy announcements, and other key information.

From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ghana Health Service used mass media, including social media, to communicate with the public about preventive measures and public health protocols. Regular presidential addresses, ministerial press briefings, and government websites reinforced this official messaging, which was coordinated by a COVID-19 task force.

Placeholder
Parents bring their babies to the Kokrobite Health Center for care in Kokrobite, Ghana, on June 28, 2022.
Credit: Nana Kofi Acquah. Copyright: © Gates Ventures, LLC. 
KEY INSIGHT

Health system–level response measures: service delivery adaptation

Mitigating obstacles to the delivery of essential health services

Placeholder
Patience Yidu brings her baby to the Kokrobite Health Center for care in Kokrobite, Ghana, on June 28, 2022.
Credit: Nana Kofi Acquah. Copyright: © Gates Ventures, LLC.

To continue delivering key essential and routine health services—while implementing public health and social measures to control the spread of COVID-19—Ghana’s health facilities stayed open from March 2020 on, while screening all patients for COVID-19. Service delivery adaptations aimed to strengthen the capacity of health workers and reduce transmission of COVID-19 in health facilities. Adaptations included the use of drones to deliver medical supplies and test samples (minimizing contact between health workers and others), health facility use of appointment systems that enabled the efficient deployment of frontline health workers (by rescheduling elective surgeries and assigning less severely ill patients to days of the week where health workers were less busy), and community health workers delivering routine essential health services via home visits.

  1. 1
    Coronavirus: Ghana named among countries with best response in the world. GhanaWeb. May 17, 2020. Accessed February 6, 2023. https://web.archive.org/web/20201118161359/https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Coronavirus-Ghana-named-among-countries-with-best-response-in-the-world-954532

ask an expert

Our team and partners are available to answer questions that clarify our research, insights, methodology, and conclusions.
Ask an Expert