According to interviews with key informants (KIs), some elements of Bangladesh’s health system that predated the COVID-19 emergency – such as a strong culture of collaboration and a flexible health-system structure – gave the country’s officials and health care providers a toolbox they could adapt and extend to maintain EBI delivery and mitigate drops in EBI coverage early in the pandemic. At the same time, however, other preexisting elements of Bangladesh’s health acted as barriers to EBI maintenance.

Contextual factors that predated the pandemic emergency include:

Culture of data availability, quality, and use [facilitator and barrier]

In Bangladesh, the public sector health system produces and relies on significant amounts of high-quality data for decision-making. The management information system (MIS) at the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) and the Directorate General of Family Planning (DGFP) allows the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to track the coverage of critical health services across the country; the Civil Registration and Vital Statistics system tracks health-related indicators; and the Supply Chain Management Portal provides critical data on the supply chain of medical goods. All of these pre-existing programs assisted the COVID-19 response.

“We have tracked all of the interventions and service utilization from MIS data to observe which one’s service provision has reduced. Then we had Zoom meetings one after another about those observations – where service utilization has reduced.”

- KI

“We have data source in our hospital, like, when and how many patients are being admitted each day, how many are recovered, what is the mortality rate. . . From those data we can see whether we are approaching in right track.”

- KI

Likewise, public officials, health care providers, and even their partners all use – and share – data to understand the health system’s capacity and track its improvement.


“We use the same software at the government, that’s why it is interoperational. . . . We are in touch with MIS, and we will be able to take all the community data when the government is ready.”

- KI

Bangladesh’s health system also has an electronic management information system that collects data from public facilities and community health workers using digital technology to link community and facility data. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many health care workers were so overwhelmed that they did not prioritize data collection, which interrupted ongoing activities.

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, limited data from private health care facilities prevented officials from integrating public and private data and drawing accurate conclusions about service coverage nationwide. The government is pushing private-sector health care providers to share their data, but this will likely take a long time.

“We talk a lot about data; unfortunately, all are public data; not a single one is private data. And you will never get a total picture until the total data system is integrated and the private data system comes into light where private and public data is fifty-fifty, right?”

- KI

Even where solid health data systems exist, their data was sometimes difficult to access and the quality of the data they compile could be poor, which prevented Bangladesh’s policymakers from using data to make informed decisions.

“They have a strong evidence system. But the problem is no analytic nerve is working. Or no one is working on a strong advanced analytical level or doing any deeper analysis.”

- KI

“We have had meetings not only with the MNCH. But also with Non-Communicable Disease Control and with nutrition services. Each of them is still concerned about data quality. There are a lot of questions about data quality.”

- KI

KIs noted that health officials were aware of these limitations and pushing for improvement. The integration of private- and public-sector data is critical for making informed decisions and drawing accurate conclusions.

Systems of learning and improvement [facilitator]

Bangladesh’s policymakers conducted real-time data analysis to address EBI disruptions early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Now in this COVID-19 situation, the policymakers need to be informed about the update time to time after doing the real-time analysis. We inform the press about these research findings; sometimes we upload them on the website. The data are stored electronically, and the real-time analyses are done in most of the cases.”

- KI

Though parts of the health system lack a strong capacity for data analysis, many facilities held data-driven feedback meetings to enable providers to identify service gaps and deliver better care.

“Every institution has their data . . . and they have done intervention and feedback meetings at the same time.”

- KI

“We have weekly monitoring meetings covering the whole of Bangladesh organized by the Directorate General of Health Services. Our civil surgeons and UNH&FPOs [Upazila Health & Family Planning officers] were present there. There, on behalf of EPI [the Expanded Programme on Immunization], our program managers and we extracted data from DHIS2 regularly, and we used to talk to the managers of those areas that have low coverage. And we listened to their problems, and we provided real-time solutions there.”

- KI

Health officials in Bangladesh also learned from the guidelines and recommendations produced by other countries and organizations for pandemic response and EBI maintenance.

Culture of collaboration and coordination [facilitator]

Just as Bangladesh’s COVID-19 response built on existing networks of partnership, coordination, and collaboration, so did its efforts to recover from EBI disruptions and maintain high-quality health services of all kinds. For instance, a group of partners created guidelines for breastfeeding for COVID-positive mothers.

“WHO said all can go with slight risk of transmission from the COVID-positive mother to the newborn, but the benefit outweighs the risk. And also, they gave us a way of how a mother should breastfeed, what care or precautions she should take. So, when we started having all these things in our hand, we sat together. The government being the main was in the driving seat and . . . the development partners like UNICEF, WHO, Save the Children and even iccdr,b [International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh]; all the people who have been in the field for a long time to think about the maternal and newborn child health. We looked at the evidence and then we had a country adaptation, we had a series of workshops, then we developed our own manual which is, you know, could be around 90% similar to that of the recommendation from WHO, with a little bit of a country adaptation, then we also developed some manual and SOPs [standard operating procedures].”

- KI

KIs also noted that partners working in the field carried out joint tasks such as contact tracing and research.

Health system structure [facilitator and barrier]

Bangladesh’s health system includes four directorates under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: DGHS, DGFP, the Directorate of Nursing Services, and the Directorate of Drug Administration. These directorates comprise a strong infrastructure for service delivery: for instance, Bangladesh’s immunization program is strong and well structured at all levels, so the country did not face a crisis of vaccine supply during any phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. (Where vaccination services were interrupted, it was because health workers and parents were afraid of contracting COVID-19.)

However, KIs report that Bangladesh’s primary health care system is much less robust. Rates of facility-based delivery, for example, are low.

“When mothers go to the hospital, they have different kinds of complaints, such as they don’t get the proper service, or they have to pay the service charge, or the service providers behave rudely.”

- KI

Some KIs attributed this gap in service provision in part to the country’s shortage of nurses and midwives: available health care workers were already overburdened, and they were forced to multitask in order to meet high demand for their services.1In fact, critical human-resource shortages are endemic across Bangladesh’s health care system.

Community health worker (CHW) system [facilitator]

According to interviews with KIs, Bangladesh’s existing system of community health workers enabled the rapid expansion of health education and health service delivery at the community level before and during the pandemic. Early in the pandemic, with technical guidance from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh’s government initiated different strategies to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus, including facilitating community-based prevention practices by engaging CHWs to respond to COVID-19 in their communities. (COVID-response activities included educating households on prevention and treatment, contact tracing in their communities, and referring clients to facilities for testing and advanced care.) This task shifting increased the availability of health workers for COVID-19 response and was critical to the quick recovery of evidence-based interventions for child health.

Supply-chain system [facilitator and barrier]

Most KIs did not report any problems with stock outs of essential drugs, equipment, or vaccines for routine immunization or child health services during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, many reported that their hospitals were able to continue as they had before.

“Our service was not interrupted for a day or for an hour. Everything was functional at the outdoor children ward, indoor children ward, neonatal ward, gynecological ward and EPI. All child and maternal health-related services, like antenatal, natal, and postnatal care services provision, were continuing. The anesthesia department and pathological department were also functional. Every department was running . . . and the hospital was not closed at all.”

- KI

However, other informants pointed to challenges with the procurement of materials needed for COVID-19 response and with logistics in general.

National leadership and accountability [facilitator]

In Bangladesh, leaders at all levels were committed to maintaining the provision of key evidence-based interventions for reducing U5M—ANC, PNC, and other maternal and children’s health services – during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Of course, there was a commitment from the national level like from the Ministry of Health or DGHS that we should keep running these services even in this pandemic situation. And as a whole, those who were our stakeholders also declared their solidarity with us to keep continuing the services in this situation.”

- KI

In spite of these facilitating factors in Bangladesh’s enabling environment, however, most of the KIs still reported EBI disruptions during the study period.

  1. 1
    Razu SR, Yasmin T, Arif TB, et al. Challenges Faced by Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Inquiry From Bangladesh. Front Public Health. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.647315

What can we learn from Bangladesh’s experience?