Available data shows that widespread efforts to address these early supply- and demand-side challenges had an effect, at least in the public sector: starting in June 2020, key indicators began to recover from these initial disruptions. A strong enabling environment – including a strong community health system and existing networks for collaboration – and a catalog of adaptable strategies for boosting EBI coverage helped officials and health care providers respond to the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic while also mitigating disruptions to key child health interventions.
COVID-19 response in Bangladesh
According to interviews with key informants (KIs), Bangladesh’s early response to COVID-19 helped mitigate the impact of the pandemic and kept a surge of infections from overwhelming the health care system. As a result, by August 2020, the system could recover and maintain delivery of essential child health services in this emergency context.
- Early in 2020, global shortages and supply-chain issues made it difficult to locate sufficient PPE for health workers; but as time passed, officials were able to provide an adequate supply of protective equipment. They also supported the widespread use of infection prevention control (IPC) measures, contact tracing, and isolation training. The Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) also provided online training on these topics to providers and managers.
- Government officials made funds available for COVID-19 response, set up separate COVID-19 treatment centers, and allocated special teams of doctors and nurses for pandemic response. Task-shifting likewise increased the emergency availability of health care workers.
- Rapid antigen tests became available at lower levels of the health system, facilitating patient triage.
Most of the strategies Bangladesh implemented to prevent or respond to COVID-related drops in EBI coverage were already in place before the pandemic and were adapted to suit their new context. We categorized these interventions into three main categories: infrastructure, policy/leadership, and human resources for health. More detail on these is below:
Many KIs pointed to Bangladesh’s culture of data use for learning and decision-making. The availability of data from the public sector (through the management information system [MIS] at Directorate General of Health Services [DGHS] and the Directorate General of Family Planning [DGFP]) enabled the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to track key health indicators and service coverage and respond quickly to the challenges that that data reflected. During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, data-driven strategies for decision-making included:
- Weekly monitoring meetings for the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) program, designed to provide feedback on low-coverage areas to managers
- The use of public MIS data to track progress, service utilization, and coverage at the district or upazila (subdistrict) level (because private data is not often available for routine use)
- Predicting the frequency of death using Sample Vital Registration System (SVRS) data
- Reviews of monthly public data (from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare along with districts and upazilas) and feedback during in-person and virtual workshops and meetings
- Reviews of public data for service disruption, including the number of children who missed vaccination, from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, districts, and upazilas
- Reviews of public data from the hospital level, including the number of patients admitted and the number of recoveries
- The use of disaggregated analysis by geographic area
- Accumulation of data from the World Health Organization to inform policymakers preparing the country to respond to COVID while maintaining health services for children under five
KIs report that even before the COVID-19 pandemic, Bangladesh had implemented digital health services across the public and private sectors to promote and protect public health. These services include telehealth; Skype and other video consultations with health care providers; data collection from remote rural areas via health management information systems; and monitoring, surveillance, and human resource development, including professional development via virtual training and orientation on new and adapted guidelines. Additional COVID-specific e-health services were added in March through July of 2020, including virtual risk communications, online contact tracing and hot-spot identification, and strengthening of pre-existing telemedicine services.
Providers in the public and private sectors alike took advantage of digital-health services such as telemedicine and video consultations to serve patients safely and distantly,1 and Bangladesh developed guidelines for telemedicine for patients, practitioners, and administrators (including trainers) at all levels of the health system in July 2020.2, 3 The public sector used telemedicine services to link patients and providers at different levels of care, including two specialized hospitals, three district hospitals, and three subdistrict hospitals. Using webcams and other videoconferencing platforms, specialists could “see” patients who had been admitted to less-specialized hospitals, eliminating the need for travel and in-person contact.4
Leveraging existing systems, capacity, and experienceBangladesh utilized its previous experience in epidemic preparedness and response – with dengue fever, Ebola, and SARS – to build capacity for EBI maintenance in the COVID-19 context.
Because KIs described community fear of contracting COVID-19 as a significant barrier to health seeking during the pandemic, officials and providers used various community engagement and awareness strategies to alleviate fears and ensure the continuity of key health services. For instance, upazila-level health managers advocated to increase community awareness regarding facility delivery; officials from the Institute of Epidemiology and Disease Control Response and elsewhere organized campaigns to raise public awareness about service provision and IPC and advertised services using Facebook, YouTube, and posters; and providers initiated courtyard meetings to increase health-seeking behavior (antenatal care [ANC], for example). Government and nongovernment satellite television channels broadcast public health guidance.
Donor and partner coordinationIn Bangladesh, governmental and nongovernmental organizations built on existing coordination networks to maintain EBI delivery during the early months of the COVID crisis. For examples, donors and implementing partners came together to provide technical assistance and guidelines for the continuation of maternal and child health services. Likewise, DGHS coordinated a technical working group, including implementing partners and donors like UNICEF, to develop a priority action plan for COVID-19 response.
Focus on equityEspecially during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of Bangladesh focused its attention on maintaining EBIs in hilly, hard-to-reach areas such as Sylhet and Chattogram. Staffing health initiatives with local providers can help build a sense of community ownership.
Updated guidelines, protocols, and training for maintaining EBIs in the COVID-19 context newIn the months after the onset of COVID-19 in Bangladesh, Bangladeshi officials also developed COVID response strategies specifically designed to maintain EBIs in the pandemic context. These included new MNCH guidelines for essential service delivery, EPI service delivery guidelines, and guidelines for community clinics, as well as:
- The continued provision of newborn care following COVID-19 protective measures
- The development of specific guidelines allowing COVID-infected children to continue to receive Kangaroo Mother Care
- Provider training on COVID-19 transmission so newborn care can continue (for instance, by assuring mothers that the virus cannot be transmitted via breastmilk)
- Encouraging facility delivery after checking for COVID-19 infection
- The preparation of a standard operating procedure for EBI delivery in the COVID-19 context
- Designating separate queues for ANC so patients do not come into contact with one another
- Adapting existing centers and hospitals to maintain EHS delivery as well as COVID-19 treatment
Officials provided orientations on these guidelines and strategies to nurses, doctors, paramedics, and other health care providers, reassuring them that they could continue to provide services to mothers, newborns, and children even during the pandemic.
Two KIs also reported some level of transportation support for health care workers during the pandemic period; however, this support was inconsistent and not widespread.
Health officials in Bangladesh implemented some interventions via existing cadres of community health workers. For instance, BRAC built community trust by restoring outreach sessions for immunization; conducting household visits to promote demand for essential health services and raise awareness about COVID-19; providing education to boost health-seeking behavior (including ANC) among pregnant mothers and mothers of young children over the phone; conducting syndromic surveillance in urban areas; and bolstering the capacity of community clinics by helping triage patients and providing PPE, IPC, and data management training to staff.
Mentorship, supervision, and training and strengthening human resourcesAccording to interviews with KIs, officials provided various virtual trainings in response to initial EBI disruptions early in the COVID-19 pandemic. These included provider training on the transmission of COVID-19 to enable newborn care to continue; Community Nutrition Center trainings; district-level trainings on hypertension (high blood pressure); and training for administrators on updated health guidelines.
Officials and providers also reimagined processes for regular mentorship and field supervision of health facilities to suit the pandemic context.
-
1
Rahman SMM, Hossain SM, Jahan MUJ. Digital Health During COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2020;46(2):66-7. https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v46i2.49014
-
2
Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council (BM&DC). Telemedicine Guidelines. Dhaka: BM&DC; 2020. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://www.bmdc.org.bd/docs/BMDC_Telemedicine_Guidelines_July2020.pdf
-
3
Khan MM, Rahman SMT, AnjumIslam ST. The Use of Telemedicine in Bangladesh During COVID-19 Pandemic. E-Health Telecommun Syst Networks. 2021;10(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.4236/etsn.2021.101001
-
4
Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS). Telemedicine Service. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://old.dghs.gov.bd/index.php/en/home/84-english-root/ehealth-eservice/490-telemedicine-service